Breach of Director Duties-Free-Samples for Students-Myassignment

Question: Use the article Findout what Voilation he did relate with law and few examples as in book and explain what he should have done. Answer: Introduction A recent news article, which appeared in the ABC News, covered the Nathan Tinkler being banned by the ASIC for managing the company, where he failed in his duties as a director (Letts, 2017). The following parts elucidate upon the breaches which took place in this case, particularly in context of the director duties. Analysis of Case The key issue in this case was related to the breach of provisions covered under Part 2D.1 and PART 5.7B of the Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth). It is the duty of the directors in Australia, to prevent the company from trading where the incurring of a particular can result in the company being insolvent; or undertaking a debt when the company was already insolvent; particularly when there were reasonable grounds of believing that the company is insolvent, or would become insolvent as a result of indulging in the transaction as per section 588G of this act (Cassidy, 2006). In short, the directors have a duty to prevent insolvent trading by the company. The breach of this section not only attracts civil liabilities, but criminal liabilities as well. The civil penalties are covered under section 1317E, where upon the court making a declaration of contravention, the ASIC can apply for pecuniary penalties as per section 206C or can apply for the disqualification of the director from holding such post in any company for a certain period, as per section 1317G of this act (Australian Government, 2013). In the given case, Nathan Tinkler was barred from managing the business for a period of 3 years and nine months, as he allowed the company to trade while it was insolvent in 11 different companies, and allowing one company to continue its operations at loss. As per section 588G, Tinkler had the duty to not indulge in such insolvent trading, which he did, and whereby the ASIC got him banned from managing any company based on section 1317G. The incident came to light when the liquidators analysed the collapse of these companies (Letts, 2017). Apart from this breach, Tinkler also breached the duty as a director where he was required to show care and diligence in managing those 11 companies, based on section 180 of this Act. However, he failed to do so by involving his portfolio of interest in thoroughbred sports and racing, and mining. He also failed in showing good faith towards 11 different companies, was required on his part, based on section 181 of this act (Federal Register of Legislation, 2017). The breach of these two sections also attract civil penalty under section 1317E, which was a contributory factor to Tinkler being barred from managing the affairs of the company in the nation for almost 4 years. The disqualification order was deemed as a teaching for the companies, regarding the consequences which they would have to bear for managing the company in a poor manner, which results in the fiduciary duties of a director being contravened (Letts, 2017). Conclusion From the discussion carried on above, it becomes clear that by managing the company in an improper manner, where insolvent trading was involved, Tinkler breached his director duties, resulting in a disqualification order being passed against him. References Australian Government. (2013) Corporations Act 2001. [Online] Australian Government. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2013C00605 [Accessed on: 23/10/17] Cassidy, J. (2006) Concise Corporations Law. 5th ed. NSW: The Federation Press. Federal Register of Legislation. (2017) Corporations Act 2001. [Online] Federal Register of Legislation. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2013C00605 [Accessed on: 23/10/17] Letts, S. (2017) Nathan Tinkler banned by ASIC from managing companies over serious failures as a director. [Online] ABC News. Available from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-24/former-rich-lister-nathan-tinkler-banned-by-asic/8554224 [Accessed on: 23/10/17]